Do Walk Breaks Slow You Down?

I liked LOLO's running application, but each upgrade presented challenges. After upgrades, I lost all data and that's unacceptable. It's not even up for discussion. So, I began looking for alternatives. I found RunKeeper.com through a MiddleGeorgiaSparks.com friend and marathoner. It has replaced LOLO as my application for runs. With RunKeeper I can create routes and goals. I can listen to podcasts, music, or books while running. I can setup my own schedule of walk/run breaks. You can vary the lengths of walk/runs in the same session. It's very flexible, but has it's issues as well. But that's not the focus of this blog entry.
I've been running using various break times. Sometimes it's 3 running 1 walking. Other times is a series of running increasing by one minute each cycle. My time has been consistent, but I wanted to increase speed. This morning I ran 4.31 miles without a walk break. I ran at a comfortable pace I knew I could sustain. (Pay no attention to the 16:47 current pace. That's a BUG). Here's the Fifty One on what I learned:
- I'm just a bit faster using walk breaks. (Just like Jeff said I would be)
- I'm no more tired using walk breaks than without.
- Attempting to insert a walk break at 3 miles is not a good idea.
- I burn up more calories using breaks.
- I can handle upping my run time if necessary.
In summary: The Walk/Run method is just as Jeff said it was. I'm just a little faster taking the breaks. I prefer the RunKeeper.com app at this point.
Galloways Book on Running By Galloway, Jeff/ Golueke, Richard (ILT)/ Indritz, Edna (ILT)/ Wills, David (ILT) (Google Affiliate Ad)
Galloways Book on Running By Galloway, Jeff/ Golueke, Richard (ILT)/ Indritz, Edna (ILT)/ Wills, David (ILT) (Google Affiliate Ad)
Comments